Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Ergonomics and you

Man blogging consistently is harder than I thought it'd be. T__T
So here I'm going to repost something I wrote a while ago, but updated, and with references included. Maybe it'll get the juices flowing again.

Ergonomics
As a philologist, I enjoy breaking down the words we use, both rarely and every day. Perhaps in examining the roots and history of why we speak the way we do, there is meaning, or even understanding, to be divined.
Like many of our technical terms, ergonomics comes from Latin. Ergo- refers to work. -Nomy is an interesting component, meaning something like law, or management. -Ics is a very dense little particle. It means the entire field of study; of art and science and knowledge.
A rough translation is "human engineering", which may explain my predilection for the field. :P
The best efforts of humanity are found in our efforts to better ourselves and our world.

Meta-lingual-discussion aside, I know I'm not the only one that spends a lot of time at their computer, so I thought a little guide to workspace ergonomics would be a useful post.

Starting off is the fact that while our knees, hips, and spines were good enough for our ancestors to survive, procreate, and provide enough for their children to grow up and repeat the cycle, selective pressure didn't give a crap if they would do so without giving us chronic pain into our dotage. Thus, they're all a bit fragile, and we need to take care of them if we want a comfortable middle and old age.

First things first, I recognize that few, if any of you, are going to run out and implement all of these suggestions immediately, but I'm putting this up as food for thought, a reference to check back on if you need to, and something to keep in mind if you get the chance to reorganize your work space.

Sit down work doesn't affect our knees so much, but humanity evolved legs in a world without chairs, so our spines and hips are a bit at a loss as to what to do with them.
Remember when you were goofing off in class, and kept tilting your chair back on two legs, tossing pencils at the ceiling or whatever? You thought you were just bored, but apparently we were unconsciously adopting the ideal sitting posture. If you spend more than a half-hour at a time working at your computer, You want your chair to support a 90° angle between legs and torso, and you want your torso tipped back about 35–45°. This way, the weight of your body is more evenly distributed, and you derive the maximum benefit from any lumbar and shoulder support the chair has.
However, you also want your feet on the floor, otherwise the weight of your legs is pressing your hamstrings right into the edge of your chair, which is a recipe for discomfort, and in extreme cases, even damage.



stick figure diagram
As you can see by my masterful art skills, there are pixels.


You also want to spend most of your time sitting perfectly evenly, shoulders, spine, and hips all aligned. Lateral stress on the spine can cause soreness in the back and hips. Arms should hang neutrally from the shoulders, ie, you shouldn't feel any stress or effort in your shoulders to keep your arms in position. Your medial plane should bisect your keyboard between the G and H keys (or I and D on Dvorak), and the exact middle of your monitor.
Now, craning your neck downward isn't, generally, good for you. Your spine forms a far-back fulcrum for all of your head's weight to wrench on. But here, you're leaned back, with your head straight up and down. The weight of your head is distributed into the head, neck, or shoulder rest, and you end up with even less weight on your spine than when sitting upright.
But if your chair lacks a headrest, this position might fatigue your neck muscles. This is a good time to point out another important ergonomic tip: switch positions. Though what I'm outlining is the best biomechanical posture, static pressure still has the potential to kink muscles, blood vessels, and nerves.
Of course, the best way to do this is to get up and take a quick walk every so often. But short of that, sit up straighter, or lean further back or pull one leg up, do something to change the forces affecting your body, and give pressure points a chance to recover.

Speaking of pressure points, viscoelastic memory foam is some nice stuff. It may not have been developed specifically for NASA, but they sure saw the benefits. The stuff that you now find in Tempurpedic mattresses was actually developed in Sweden, for hospitals. It is ironic (actually ironic too), that hospitals are one of the worst places to be when you're sick. Think about it, your immune system has been compromised, so let's stick you in a building with a lot of people carrying infectious diseases? Yay?
One of the features that used to compound this problem were bedsores. When you literally can't move, those pressure points get to be a serious problem. As in moisture builds up, making it a lovely environment for bacteria, which infest the skin, making raw patches, which continued pressure causes to become open wounds. Memory foam was created to alleviate pressure points completely, which is what makes it such a good material for beds, pillows, and yes, high end chairs. (You don't often see memory foam in chairs because you need a much higher density foam—ie, expensive—than that in mattresses, where your weight is more spread out, and pillows, where there's not much weight.)

So that's sitting. How about typing? Tendinitis and/or tendinosis of the wrists/forearms/hands is something most of us in this modern world deal with regularly. It happens because certain small movements, repeated over and over, can damage and possibly inflame tendons.
As a note, the carpal tunnel syndrome happens when pressure builds up in a small channel within your wrist. The pressure affects the thick nerve that controls your hand, and this causes general shooting pains through the hands, wrists, and forearms. For obvious reasons, tendinitis (inflammation of tendons) of the tendons in the actual carpal tunnel can cause the carpal tunnel syndrome. But while the picture painted by modern medical science is a touch murky, as far as I can find, it's generally believed that only certain twisting motions will cause an inflammation there. Basically, writing, painting and typing inflame or damage other tendons.
The midline of your keyboard should obviously be even with the medial plane of your body. Obviously, if your arms are angled in, your wrists need to be angled back out to put everything in the right position for typing. One wrist curved more than the other is obviously going to be under more strain. This is exaggerated on smaller laptop keyboards. Ergonomic keyboards are split so that your wrist doesn't need to bend at all. But if your keyboard is at the right height/position, the arrangement of the keys and of your fingers should not put a significant medial bend in the wrist. Still, couldn't hurt. Plus some of us have different length fingers than others.

You want your hands to be slightly higher than the elbows. If your fingers are on the home row, this position gives your fingers the a very neutral amount of curvature. Thus you require only minimal extension or flexion to hit the keys above and below. When you need to hit a key to the side (enter, backspace, tab, tilde, etc) try and do it with fingers and elbows, rather than wrist.

Mouse position is very important. Listen up WoWees. It's very very easy to try and sling your mouse around with your wrist. That's bad. Don't do that. Please.
With the keyboard in the right position, the best place for your mouse is on a slightly inclined tray right above your numpad. This lets you hold the mouse with zero wrist flexion, and move it smoothly from the elbow, which is ideal. I know that this is pretty hard to arrange. In fact, I've only seen one or two commercial products that allow you to follow this advice from the "famous" University of Georgia ergonomics study. But don't despair yet. Laptop users actually have a slight advantage here, in that they can just put their mouse pad where they need it. Left-hand mousers actually have it even easier! Just prop your mouse up immediately to the left of any regular keyboard, and you're good to go. If none of these are options, a slightly angled out, tilted up mouse-pad platform just to the right of your keyboard is the next best bet.
But whatever you do, don't rest your wrist or arm on anything, and move your mouse from the elbow, not the wrist.
On that note, remember that your keyboard and mouse are the parts of your computer you have real, direct interaction with. And furthermore, they sure don't go obsolete the way the internal components do. Get a good quality keyboard, and it'll last you decades. The IBM Model M clicky keyboard has a solid, tactile click that helps you put in only the amount of force you need, instead of grinding down on a plastic dome. Others have expounded upon their value, so I'll leave it at that.
Similar advice applies to your monitor, speakers/headphones, mouse, and something very few people consider in much detail: the mouse-pad. I'm not expecting to gain many converts to the world of expensive rigid plastic mouse-pads. A mouse sliding easily with the smallest possible impetus is a joy few know.

And finally, viewing.
Lighting is important, but it's pretty basic: minimize reflections and contrast.
If there's something reflected in your monitor, your eyes won't be sure what to focus on. They'll end up rapidly switching between what's on the screen, and what's reflected in it, and that's a recipe for eye fatigue. Similarly, if your monitor is dim, and the area behind it bright, or vice versa, you're (somewhat literally!) looking at eyestrain. You also really don't want any direct sources of illumination in your peripheral vision, as the rod cells in your eyes
This means that ideally, everything behind your screen is lit by indirect light to exactly the same illumination as the screen, and everything in front of it is perfect matte black.
For the real world, I recommend a torchiere (ceiling directed standing lamp), or maybe a lamp behind your monitor (credit Jessica), half-closed blinds, and an otherwise dim room. Modern CFLs are recommended for their energy savings and cool white light. If there's a significant amount of light reflecting off of or coming from you or the scenery behind you, and there's absolutely no way to move your monitor... you're screwed. Curl up and die.

Your forehead should be even with monitor's top bezel, allowing your eyes to cover everything in one sweep (you look down more naturally than up). You should be far enough back that you don't need to move your head at all, nor your eyes much, to see any part of the screen.

As for the screen setting itself, if you have a CRT, make damn sure it's set to a refresh rate higher than 75Hz. Anything less and you'll be lucky to avoid splitting headaches.
For both, your "contrast" setting should usually be at max, and the brightness at the lowest possible level where you can only just barely distinguish between black and the gray one standard step above it.





Set "contrast" to 100, decrease brightness to zero, then step it up until you can tell them apart.


This is recommended in a quite a few places, for text especially, and most games (I remember that Half-Life actually had a calibration screen that instructed you in this set-up). I think some artists prefer a little less contrast and more brightness for color fidelity? I don't have any references, but if it's that important to you, get a good monitor color calibrator, and follow its software's instructions.

Thank you. I hope this leads to a little less occupational stress for someone, somewhere. Please tell me if I've missed anything, or you have an issue with any part of this advice.

Thursday, March 19, 2009

√(evil)? what about the √(good)?

Tell me if you've heard this one before: "Religion and spirituality is where morality comes from." Basically, implying that the entirely visibly beneficial actions and logically sound beliefs of most sane individuals must have some supernatural basis.
Part of this saw is the idea that creationists reject evolution because coming from monkeys [sic] means we're no better than monkeys! There's nowhere for morality to come from!
Which I find so very hilarious for two reasons: one is because so many other primate societies are far nicer and more peaceable than ours. The other is that actually, herd behavior is precisely where our instinctual morals come from.

The monkey/ape confusion is just sad.

Even more sad is the idea that religion is inherently more moral.

My selection bias is showing. Obviously the news about religion that comes to my attention is generally going to be the kind that incites attention: the outrageous and extreme.

I don't have a problem with religious or spiritual people. I was a deist for a long time. My beef is with error, calumny, and irrectitude.

Monday, January 19, 2009

Martin Luther King Jr

Today (heh, only just barely, as I'm posting this near midnight) was the anniversary of the birth of Martin Luther King Jr.
I think you'll agree with me that that's an event worth celebrating. I also hope you'll spare a thought for the many unsung heroes of the struggle to create a better world.

I read his letter from a Birmingham jail earlier today, and found myself very moved. It's really worth at least skimming through. It's actually somewhat uplifting, seeing how far we've come. Although I found myself thinking "Man, I wish I'd done something that productive in jail...."

Here is a YouTube link to one of his most famous speeches too.

Prejudice and discrimination of any sort is inherently counter to the best interests of humanity at large. Xenophobia is a deeply ingrained part of our neuro-psychological make-up, yet examples of overcoming this limitation abound. A heterogeneous society is strongest, it's diverse sociological and genetic make-up allowing it to weather the broadest range of physical and idealogical disaster; allowing the most evolution and advancement.
Thus I think it's important that we continue to advance in a societal revolution, overturning social norms that create the rigid paradigm that allows such destructive behavior, such as sexism, racism, and other expressions of xenophobia to continue.

Lobby your politicians, your mayors, senators, congressmen and school boards to revolutionize our education system. Education is a self-renewing resource. The more and better educated our citizens are, the more people there will be to educate each successive generation. Don't bother trying to impose "tolerance" from the outside, but teach rationality, and that horse will drink all the water it needs.

Heh, I think you can tell this is something I feel passionately about.
The world can be better than it is now. Let us stand on the shoulders of giants, giants such as Martin Luther King Jr, and continue our climb higher.

Friday, January 9, 2009

The Recently Deflowered Mind

I have absolutely no idea whatsoever what I could say about this.


Edit: I fixed the link. It went down for some reason.

Also, Jesse, I'm so happy for you, and you have all of my support.

Tuesday, January 6, 2009

Robert Talks About Some Books

So I started that "Read 50 Books in a Year" last year in September. Being an 80 minute bus ride from my school campus, I made some pretty good headway into it.

I'm gonna talk briefly about the books I read during that challenge, and some others I've read since. This might actually have to turn into a series of posts. Since I'll mostly only be able to say, "This was cool" or "Eh," this probably won't tell you much aside from the kind of books I like. But there's the off chance you'll skim through and find something you'd like to pick up. If this happens even once, it'll all have been worth it.

I've linked to Powell's Book Store if they have the book, Amazon otherwise, but —assuming you live here— don't forget about Multnomah County Library. I'm a big fan of libraries, mostly because I'm poor, but also because I almost never reread books anyways.

Maybe someday I'll become some big-shot blog guy, and I'll come back and change these all to Amazon Affiliate links.


Starship Troopers
One of the most interesting observations on reading this book was noticing how very very different it was from the movie. So of course, I looked it up. Turns out, the movie was about half-way through production before they realized how similar it was to the book, Starship Troopers, and, in a fantastic lesson about making lemonade from lemons, licensed the rights rather than be sued.
To make a proper movie about the book you'd have to change a few things. More people need to die (oh, gee, you mean people pass on during war time? Thanks for letting us now Heinlein!). There needs to be more sexism: despite powered god damn armor, women aren't in the terrine shock troops, and Rico often drifts off into musings about his protector complex for the sainted inhabitants of womandom. Really, that's a persistent theme: Rico drifting into la la land and telling you about it. The movie would be seventy percent long shots of Rico sitting there, as his voice-over begins a thoughtful philosophy lesson (about corporal punishment, stratocracy, or how much the modern historic US armed forces sucked), which would fade in to just Robert Heinlein talking to you as it went on.
Later this week, look for "Old Man's War" which has some interesting comparisons.

The Colour of Magic
The Light Fantastic
Equal Rites
Mort
If I need to say anything about Terry Prachet's work, you have either been living under a rock for your entire life, or are not worthy of continued breath.
That said, it's really interesting to go all the way back to the beginning and watch his work evolve as you read through. None of these are my most favorite Discworld books, but they're all worth reading.
I'd be pretty surprised if you didn't know that Terry Pratchett is a sterling, shining author of some of the best fantasy parody out there. He's also probably contracted early onset Alzheimer's :(
Please, let's all cross our fingers for some of the new therapies that've been developed recently (even if one of them requires weekly injections into the spinal column...).
What I've always most enjoyed about the Discworld series is that even while it's poking fun at the absurdities of fantasy, it does so in a loving way that never turns farcical or grotesque.

A Wizard of Earthsea
Some of these books I'd read before, but the last time was years and years ago, so it was a bit like unearthing buried treasure to find some of the gems like A Wizard of Earthsea.
Ursula K Le Guin's writing has that poetic and mythic flair that differentiates fantasy escapism potboilers from fantastic literature.
I know a lot of people disagree with me on the subject of Tolkien's work. I found the world fascinating, but the books wouldn't have held my interest without the sublime poetry of the words.
For me, Wizard of Earthsea is much the same. But please, don't let that throw you off. Though it has that same artistic quality, Le Guin's writing is a uniquely wonderful experience.

Blood Music
Greg Bear writes some interesting hard-ish Sci-Fi. Aside from Blood Music, I've started two of his other books, Forge of God and Legacy. I quite enjoy the themes and ideas of his work, and he's far from a terrible writer, but he lacks that certain quality that makes the best authors so engaging.
Blood Music is a bit difficult to describe without giving away the plot. It really feels like a fascinating idea that's had a bit of narrative hung off it, rather than a fully fleshed out tale. Do read if you're interested in the possibilities of future bio- and nano-technology.

Shadowmarch
Tad Williams is also the author of the Memory, Sorrow, & Thorn trilogy, as well as the cyberpunk Otherland series. Otherland's first book, "City of Golden Shadow" took too long to start for me, so I think that says something about it. However, Memory, Sorrow, & Thorn is very nearly everything I think a high fantasy novel should be, so I was really looking forward to Shadowmarch.
I was a bit disappointed, but maybe my expectations were too high? It comes off as a decent but not superlative fantasy tale. The fae creatures want to take their land back, and at the same time, the empire south of the sea wants to take some land period. What's a small highlands kingdom with a kidnapped king to do?
What with the strange mystical enemies to the north, complex multi-sided wars, constant political strife, and more than one viewpoint character, comparisons with A Song of Ice and Fire are inevitable. I'll spare you the suspense and just tell you that Shadowmarch loses, but that doesn't mean it's not worth reading. I'm heartily in favor of more fantasy books putting a strong focus on political conflict instead of trotting out the same dusty old clichés.
I'll probably pick up the next one one of these days, and if you're a fantasy fan that needs something to kill time during a bus ride, maybe you should too.

Wizard's Bane
Wizardry Recompiled
Hmm. I think today's post may have to end on a low note.
Honestly, I'm not sure I would've read these if they weren't available free on the Internet. They have their moments, but it just doesn't follow through on the execution.
Your brand of fantasy escapism is obviously a pretty personal choice. For myself, real people pulled into the world of fantasy has always been a bit of a turn off. I think it dilutes the purity of the experience for me.
But I liked the unique touch here. A programmer whose knowledge of algorithms, abstraction and automation gives him an interesting edge over the hidebound wizards. Still, when one of the linchpins of the story (how the "Wiz" does his magical thang) is so poorly defined and inconsistently treated, the books burns through their goodwill rather quickly.
These are another relatively light fun read, but probably not worth your time, unless you're dying to read anything.

Sunday, January 4, 2009

Internets is serious business.

So I've noticed this phenomenon, it occurs when people, particularly on the Internet, decide to have an intelligent, rational discussion about their beliefs in certain matters.

Yes, this does end in fire.

Typically, these individuals people have quite unremarkable and moderate opinions, which they will go on to state in relative terms to one another, and then continue into what some would call a "full and frank exchange of views".

It often happens that these people's positions are markedly similar to one another's (though don't try to tell them that!). Now, of course there are real differences of opinion here, but they're typically obscured by the way they're stated. Mostly, we state things in relative terms, but apply them to differing baselines.

Give me leave to tell a little story.
Alice and Bob are arguing about welfare affirmative-action Iraq abortion gun-control net-neutrality the price of apples.

Alice says, "I think apples are too expensive."
Bob says, "Apples should cost something."
They aren't specific and never say, "I think the apple should be two dollars," (we'll say it's three right now) which they both believe.
Bob is arguing against people who think apples should be free, and paid for with fairy dust.
Alice is arguing against people who want to jack the price of the apple up even further, to line their fat Corporate greed holes.
But they both think they're arguing at each other.

Then, this cross talk will also obscure other, real issues. (Bob, for instance, thinks genetically modified apples may not be safe, whereas Alice believes that in this particular instance the modifications are well understood. Both of these positions will be discussed, not in terms of the actual information of them, but as part of a larger position into which both are walling the other into caricatures of.)

There are complicating factors. For instance, Carol, who things apples should be one fifty, and Dave who thinks apples are fine at their current price. But Bob feels like a dick with nothing to say if he can only say "Um, one-fifty is too cheap," so it requires him to "demonize" Carol, and portray her as the communist she's not. (And vice versa.)

And of course, don't forget Eve, who really does think three bucks is too cheap for an apple, and Fred, who doesn't really think apples should be free, but says he does because he likes being a dick.


Now... I'm sure that while reading this, you've realized, quite correctly, that there's nothing particularly Earth shattering about this revelation. But I've written it all down because the fascinating ability of humans to store information externally can give rise to interesting insights.
Sure, it's obvious that there are a lot of people out there that think different than you do. Equally obviously, these people are wrong. But the next time you become upset with someone, or even find yourself nodding along to what they're saying, take a minute to figure out whether those words mean what you think they do. With perspective, a lot of disagreements disappear.

Thursday, January 1, 2009